Why, Sarah

[Jose Gaspar]

In article <***@4ax.com>, Ken Ehrett says...
Ken says: "I want that fucking fat whore, Deborah Lynch of Hometown Realty,
Jacksonville Florida... I dream of her day and night. I fantasize what it
would be like for two 300 pounders to be in the same bed..."

[Greg Procter]

Post by Jose Gaspar
Ken says: "I want that fucking fat whore, Deborah Lynch of Hometown Realty,
Jacksonville Florida... I dream of her day and night. I fantasize what it
would be like for two 300 pounders to be in the same bed..."

This brings up a number of philosophical questions ...

- Do US bed makers make double beds capable of holding circa 600 lbs of
humanity?
- Does 600 lbs count as humanity?
- Are 600lb loading beds rated for rampant, active or static loadings?
- What happens when pets owned by the 600lb (whatever) jump on the bed
at inopportune moments?
- Are such beds grease-proof?
- I was looking at Danske Mobler slat bed bases the other weekend, the
slats were about 2 1/2" x 1/4" white pine. Do they supply 4x2" slats for
the US market?
- Do I really want answers to these questions?

Regards,
Greg.P.

[Jose Gaspar]

Post by Greg Procter

Post by Jose Gaspar
Ken says: "I want that fucking fat whore, Deborah Lynch of Hometown Realty,
Jacksonville Florida... I dream of her day and night. I fantasize what it
would be like for two 300 pounders to be in the same bed..."

This brings up a number of philosophical questions ...
- Do US bed makers make double beds capable of holding circa 600 lbs of
humanity?

Steel reinforced frames will work quite well. Wood frames will work if made of
double thickness red oak or hickory...

Post by Greg Procter
- Does 600 lbs count as humanity?

Ken 'supersize that meal' Ehrett and Deborah 'extra large fries' Lynch are only
a cave away from being Neanderthals.

Post by Greg Procter
- Are 600lb loading beds rated for rampant, active or static loadings?

Due to the loading structure design of the bed, the two 300 pounders would
gravitate to the center and implode on contact... resulting in one gigantic
glob of fat...

Post by Greg Procter
- What happens when pets owned by the 600lb (whatever) jump on the bed
at inopportune moments?

Instant suffocation...

Post by Greg Procter
- Are such beds grease-proof?

It doesn't matter. Spontaneous human combustion only requires enormous amounts
of fat: http://www.crystalinks.com/shc.html

Post by Greg Procter
- I was looking at Danske Mobler slat bed bases the other weekend, the
slats were about 2 1/2" x 1/4" white pine. Do they supply 4x2" slats for
the US market?

They would have to go to a lumberyard and ask for number 1 grade 2"X4" solid
oak...

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:

:>- Do US bed makers make double beds

What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
you can afford?

[Greg Procter]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>- Do US bed makers make double beds
What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
you can afford?

<sigh>
New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah - can you yanks buy triple
beds to support 900 lbs?

[Lumpy]

Post by Greg Procter
<sigh>
New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah - can you yanks buy triple
beds to support 900 lbs?

How do the laws of physics apply to this scenario? Two 300-pounders,
(granted, a ken and a clone), flopping like elephant seals in a
discount bed from Joe's Mattress Palace, attempting with four
preternaturally short, fat, sweating arms to grasp the object of
desire?

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:14:29 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
:> > <http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> lied:

:>How do the laws of physics apply to this scenario?
:>
:><http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> lied:
:>
:> Two 300-pounders, (granted, a karen,ME! and a clone), flopping like elephant seals in a
:>discount bed from Joe's Mattress Palace, attempting with four preternaturally short, fat, sweating :>arms to grasp the object of desire, a pink dildo and shove it up my greast twat?

You really are a disgusting swine, "Lumpy". ;)


------

On 20 Mar 2008 20:50:42 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:>Heartguard. Works good for heartworms, roundworms, and hookworms... Doesn't do
:>much for her tapeworm though... you can tell from the photos...
:>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:17:48 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy
<***@gmail.com> wrote:

:>On Mar 25, 12:05 pm, "GodHatesKaren" <http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm>
:>wrote:
:>> Lumpy <http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> wrote:

:>>
:>> Arrgggh, Lumpy -- you gotta stop that.  You're makin' me woozy.  That is one
:>> disgusting visual, http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

:>hahHAHAHAHAHA.

Anyone miss "Lumpy" ....? No? ;0

------

On 20 Mar 2008 20:50:42 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:>Heartguard. Works good for heartworms, roundworms, and hookworms... Doesn't do
:>much for her tapeworm though... you can tell from the photos...
:>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:09:18 -0700, "GodHatesKaren"
< http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm > wrote:


:>Have you noticed how extremely ANGRY he is all the time?....

":>Which makes his attempted SWEETHEART SCAMMING of her that much
:> more chickenshit and reprehensible. " - Fat Billy Cmelak/Hoodoo


:>and so is Sarah.

http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm
HAwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW HA HA HA HAwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW


:>They are both filled with rage toward others.

http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm
HAwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW HA HA HA HAwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW


:>Envy? Frustration?

":>Which makes his attempted SWEETHEART SCAMMING of her that much
:> more chickenshit and reprehensible. " - Fat Billy Cmelak/Hoodoo

:>These two have absolutely NO sense of humoUr ......


HAwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW HA HA HA HAwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Sure we do! http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:09:18 -0700, "GodHatesKaren"
<http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> wrote:

:>Have you noticed how extremely ANGRY he is all the time?....and so is Sarah.

http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

HAwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW HA HA HA HAwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:26:49 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>
:>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>>
:>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> you can afford?
:>
:><sigh>
:>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -

What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?

:>can you yanks buy triple
:>beds to support 900 lbs?

What exactly is a "triple bed" groggy?

------

On 20 Mar 2008 20:50:42 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:>Heartguard. Works good for heartworms, roundworms, and hookworms... Doesn't do
:>much for her tapeworm though... you can tell from the photos...
:>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Greg Procter]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>
:>>
:>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>>
:>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> you can afford?
:>
:><sigh>
:>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?

When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>can you yanks buy triple
:>beds to support 900 lbs?
What exactly is a "triple bed" groggy?

Well, you had eliminated "double" which leaves "single", "triple" and
"quad", "quin" etc.
I'd guess those would sell in places like Kentucky(?)

Don't start Lumpy imagining Ken-scum and partner in a single bed!
<cough, choke>

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:22:46 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>
:>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:26:49 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>>
:>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>
:>> :><sigh>
:>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>>
:>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>
:>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.

We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.


:>> :>can you yanks buy triple
:>> :>beds to support 900 lbs?
:>>
:>> What exactly is a "triple bed" groggy?
:>
:>
:>Well, you had eliminated "double" which leaves "single", "triple" and
:>"quad", "quin" etc.
:>I'd guess those would sell in places like Kentucky(?)

Dunno. Seriously. Two singles = a King, so ...? ;)

:>Don't start Lumpy imagining Ken-scum and partner in a single bed!
:><cough, choke>

"Lumpy" seems to be overly interested in everyone else's sex life....

[Greg Procter]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>
:>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>>
:>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>
:>> :><sigh>
:>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>>
:>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>
:>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.

Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
intention is that they are for two people.
You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>> :>can you yanks buy triple
:>> :>beds to support 900 lbs?
:>>
:>> What exactly is a "triple bed" groggy?
:>
:>
:>Well, you had eliminated "double" which leaves "single", "triple" and
:>"quad", "quin" etc.
:>I'd guess those would sell in places like Kentucky(?)
Dunno. Seriously. Two singles = a King, so ...? ;)

Uh huh - I hadn't considered that as the mattresses we looked at were
designed for the full width of the base.
How many Kentucky citizens to a single bed? double king? ...

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>Don't start Lumpy imagining Ken-scum and partner in a single bed!
:><cough, choke>
"Lumpy" seems to be overly interested in everyone else's sex life....

I guess that's a down-side to intelligence, imagination and excess spare
time.
I hope he carries on (comfortably) for a long time.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:41:20 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>
:>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:22:46 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:26:49 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>>
:>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>
:>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>>
:>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>
:>
:>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>intention is that they are for two people.
:>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.

We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
and King size beds for guests.

:>> :>> :>can you yanks buy triple
:>> :>> :>beds to support 900 lbs?
:>> :>>
:>> :>> What exactly is a "triple bed" groggy?
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Well, you had eliminated "double" which leaves "single", "triple" and
:>> :>"quad", "quin" etc.
:>> :>I'd guess those would sell in places like Kentucky(?)
:>>
:>> Dunno. Seriously. Two singles = a King, so ...? ;)
:>
:>
:>Uh huh - I hadn't considered that as the mattresses we looked at were
:>designed for the full width of the base.

If you have a King size mattress here in the US it will sit on a box
spring made up of two double beds.

:>How many Kentucky citizens to a single bed? double king? ...

Never been to KY. Ask here: http://www.kentuckytourism.com/


:>> :>Don't start Lumpy imagining Ken-scum and partner in a single bed!
:>> :><cough, choke>
:>>
:>> "Lumpy" seems to be overly interested in everyone else's sex life....
:>
:>
:>I guess that's a down-side to intelligence, imagination and excess spare
:>time.

No well adjusted adult wonders about other couples sex life, groggy.

:> I hope he carries on (comfortably) for a long time.


Maybe he's got some bestiality porn he'll share with you too?

[Greg Procter]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>
:>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>>
:>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>
:>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>>
:>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>
:>
:>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>intention is that they are for two people.
:>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
and King size beds for guests.

Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
Unless of course you buy them just in case a King or Queen come to
visit?

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>> :>> :>can you yanks buy triple
:>> :>> :>beds to support 900 lbs?
:>> :>>
:>> :>> What exactly is a "triple bed" groggy?
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Well, you had eliminated "double" which leaves "single", "triple" and
:>> :>"quad", "quin" etc.
:>> :>I'd guess those would sell in places like Kentucky(?)
:>>
:>> Dunno. Seriously. Two singles = a King, so ...? ;)
:>
:>
:>Uh huh - I hadn't considered that as the mattresses we looked at were
:>designed for the full width of the base.
If you have a King size mattress here in the US it will sit on a box
spring made up of two double beds.

Huhh?
Ok, we get choices in regards to bases.
I saw:
- box spring bases.
- full width slats.
- individual width slats.
- rigid base.

There were probably others.

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>How many Kentucky citizens to a single bed? double king? ...
Never been to KY. Ask here: http://www.kentuckytourism.com/
:>> :>Don't start Lumpy imagining Ken-scum and partner in a single bed!
:>> :><cough, choke>
:>>
:>> "Lumpy" seems to be overly interested in everyone else's sex life....
:>
:>
:>I guess that's a down-side to intelligence, imagination and excess spare
:>time.
No well adjusted adult wonders about other couples sex life, groggy.

You've obviously never been in the internet.

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:> I hope he carries on (comfortably) for a long time.
Maybe he's got some bestiality porn he'll share with you too?

See, you aren't well adjusted - unless of course you're well adjusted to
Ken-scum's beastiality.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:36:50 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>
:>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:41:20 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:22:46 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:26:49 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>>
:>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> and King size beds for guests.
:>
:>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.

King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.

:>Unless of course you buy them just in case a King or Queen come to
:>visit?
:>
:>
:>>
:>> :>> :>> :>can you yanks buy triple
:>> :>> :>> :>beds to support 900 lbs?
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> What exactly is a "triple bed" groggy?
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>Well, you had eliminated "double" which leaves "single", "triple" and
:>> :>> :>"quad", "quin" etc.
:>> :>> :>I'd guess those would sell in places like Kentucky(?)
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Dunno. Seriously. Two singles = a King, so ...? ;)
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Uh huh - I hadn't considered that as the mattresses we looked at were
:>> :>designed for the full width of the base.
:>>
:>> If you have a King size mattress here in the US it will sit on a box
:>> spring made up of two double beds.
:>
:>Huhh?
:>Ok, we get choices in regards to bases.
:>I saw:
:>- box spring bases.
:>- full width slats.
:>- individual width slats.
:>- rigid base.
:>
:>There were probably others.
:>
:>>
:>> :>How many Kentucky citizens to a single bed? double king? ...
:>>
:>> Never been to KY. Ask here: http://www.kentuckytourism.com/
:>>
:>> :>> :>Don't start Lumpy imagining Ken-scum and partner in a single bed!
:>> :>> :><cough, choke>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> "Lumpy" seems to be overly interested in everyone else's sex life....
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>I guess that's a down-side to intelligence, imagination and excess spare
:>> :>time.
:>>
:>> No well adjusted adult wonders about other couples sex life, groggy.
:>
:>
:>You've obviously never been in the internet.

I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
flaming aside....

[Greg Procter]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>
:>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>>
:>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> and King size beds for guests.
:>
:>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.

Err, how many people do you expect can sleep in them at one time, Sarah?

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>Unless of course you buy them just in case a King or Queen come to
:>visit?
:>
:>
:>>
:>> :>> :>> :>can you yanks buy triple
:>> :>> :>> :>beds to support 900 lbs?
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> What exactly is a "triple bed" groggy?
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>Well, you had eliminated "double" which leaves "single", "triple" and
:>> :>> :>"quad", "quin" etc.
:>> :>> :>I'd guess those would sell in places like Kentucky(?)
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Dunno. Seriously. Two singles = a King, so ...? ;)
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Uh huh - I hadn't considered that as the mattresses we looked at were
:>> :>designed for the full width of the base.
:>>
:>> If you have a King size mattress here in the US it will sit on a box
:>> spring made up of two double beds.
:>
:>Huhh?
:>Ok, we get choices in regards to bases.
:>- box spring bases.
:>- full width slats.
:>- individual width slats.
:>- rigid base.
:>
:>There were probably others.
:>
:>>
:>> :>How many Kentucky citizens to a single bed? double king? ...
:>>
:>> Never been to KY. Ask here: http://www.kentuckytourism.com/
:>>
:>> :>> :>Don't start Lumpy imagining Ken-scum and partner in a single bed!
:>> :>> :><cough, choke>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> "Lumpy" seems to be overly interested in everyone else's sex life....
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>I guess that's a down-side to intelligence, imagination and excess spare
:>> :>time.
:>>
:>> No well adjusted adult wonders about other couples sex life, groggy.
:>
:>
:>You've obviously never been in the internet.
I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
flaming aside....

Flaming aside, I'm not beyond the occassional "Wow, I bet she'd be
something in bed!" thoughts.
(Must be a male thing)

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:26:43 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>
:>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:36:50 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:41:20 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:22:46 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:26:49 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> :>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> :>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> :>> and King size beds for guests.
:>> :>
:>> :>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
:>>
:>> King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.
:>
:>Err, how many people do you expect can sleep in them at one time, Sarah?

The same number as you, one or two. What do you find confusing?

< SNIP>

:>> I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
:>> flaming aside....
:>
:>
:> Flaming aside, I'm not beyond the occassional "Wow, I bet she'd be
:>something in bed!" thoughts.
:>(Must be a male thing)

Hahahahaha !!! I'd say it fair to say most men think the way you do.
;)

[Greg Procter]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>
:>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> :>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> :>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> :>> and King size beds for guests.
:>> :>
:>> :>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
:>>
:>> King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.
:>
:>Err, how many people do you expect can sleep in them at one time, Sarah?
The same number as you, one or two. What do you find confusing?

That makes them "double beds".

They come in:
- "standard".
- "Queen".
- "King".
- "Ken-scum size".

Post by Sarah Czepiel
< SNIP>
:>> I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
:>> flaming aside....
:>
:>
:> Flaming aside, I'm not beyond the occassional "Wow, I bet she'd be
:>something in bed!" thoughts.
:>(Must be a male thing)
Hahahahaha !!! I'd say it fair to say most men think the way you do.
;)

That's the nicest thing you've ever said to me!

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:54:32 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>
:>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:26:43 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:36:50 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:41:20 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:22:46 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:26:49 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>> :>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>> :>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> :>> :>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> :>> :>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> :>> :>> and King size beds for guests.
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.
:>> :>
:>> :>Err, how many people do you expect can sleep in them at one time, Sarah?
:>>
:>> The same number as you, one or two. What do you find confusing?
:>
:>
:>
:>That makes them "double beds".

"double" is an actual size of beds and bedding in the US, groggy.


:>They come in:
:>- "standard".
:>- "Queen".
:>- "King".

We have : http://interiordec.about.com/cs/beds/l/blbedsizes.htm

Double
Queen
King
California King

:>- "Ken-scum size".

Ken weighs less than you do, Greg.


:>> < SNIP>
:>>
:>> :>> I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
:>> :>> flaming aside....
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :> Flaming aside, I'm not beyond the occassional "Wow, I bet she'd be
:>> :>something in bed!" thoughts.
:>> :>(Must be a male thing)
:>>
:>> Hahahahaha !!! I'd say it fair to say most men think the way you do.
:>> ;)
:>
:>
:>That's the nicest thing you've ever said to me!

Don't go all soft on me groggy! ;)

[Greg Procter]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>
:>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>> :>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>> :>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> :>> :>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> :>> :>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> :>> :>> and King size beds for guests.
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.
:>> :>
:>> :>Err, how many people do you expect can sleep in them at one time, Sarah?
:>>
:>> The same number as you, one or two. What do you find confusing?
:>
:>
:>
:>That makes them "double beds".
"double" is an actual size of beds and bedding in the US, groggy.

Sure, but in English speaking countries it's the number of people the
manufacturers expected would sleep in it.

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>- "standard".
:>- "Queen".
:>- "King".
We have : http://interiordec.about.com/cs/beds/l/blbedsizes.htm
Double
Queen
King
California King

Are you sure that's not "double California queen" or "fat arsed yank"?

?

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>- "Ken-scum size".
Ken weighs less than you do, Greg.

That seems unlikely - according to customary wisdom he's half as much
again as I am.
Add to that he's a foot shorter than me and that I'm a foot shorter than
I was pre-accident ...

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>> < SNIP>
:>>
:>> :>> I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
:>> :>> flaming aside....
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :> Flaming aside, I'm not beyond the occassional "Wow, I bet she'd be
:>> :>something in bed!" thoughts.
:>> :>(Must be a male thing)
:>>
:>> Hahahahaha !!! I'd say it fair to say most men think the way you do.
:>> ;)
:>
:>
:>That's the nicest thing you've ever said to me!
Don't go all soft on me groggy! ;)

Trust me Sarah, I'd never be hard on you!
(Eww yuck)

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:00:42 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>
:>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:54:32 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:26:43 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:36:50 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:41:20 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:22:46 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:26:49 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> :>> :>> :>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> :>> :>> :>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> :>> :>> :>> and King size beds for guests.
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>Err, how many people do you expect can sleep in them at one time, Sarah?
:>> :>>
:>> :>> The same number as you, one or two. What do you find confusing?
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>That makes them "double beds".
:>>
:>> "double" is an actual size of beds and bedding in the US, groggy.
:>
:>
:>Sure, but in English speaking countries it's the number of people the
:>manufacturers expected would sleep in it.

And by having it as an actual size changes that how?


:>> :>They come in:
:>> :>- "standard".
:>> :>- "Queen".
:>> :>- "King".
:>>
:>> We have : http://interiordec.about.com/cs/beds/l/blbedsizes.htm
:>>
:>> Double
:>> Queen
:>> King
:>> California King
:>
:>
:>Are you sure that's not "double California queen" or "fat arsed yank"?
:>
:>
:>> :>- "Ken-scum size".
:>>
:>> Ken weighs less than you do, Greg.
:>
:>That seems unlikely - according to customary wisdom he's half as much
:>again as I am.

Customary wisdom has never been associated with you.

:>Add to that he's a foot shorter than me and that I'm a foot shorter than
:>I was pre-accident ...

Ken is 5'10" tall. That would make you 3'5" tall now.

:>> :>> < SNIP>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
:>> :>> :>> flaming aside....
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :> Flaming aside, I'm not beyond the occassional "Wow, I bet she'd be
:>> :>> :>something in bed!" thoughts.
:>> :>> :>(Must be a male thing)
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Hahahahaha !!! I'd say it fair to say most men think the way you do.
:>> :>> ;)
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>That's the nicest thing you've ever said to me!
:>>
:>> Don't go all soft on me groggy! ;)
:>
:>
:>Trust me Sarah, I'd never be hard on you!
:>(Eww yuck)

Double EWWWW and YUCK!

[Greg Procter]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>
:>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> :>> :>> :>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> :>> :>> :>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> :>> :>> :>> and King size beds for guests.
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>Err, how many people do you expect can sleep in them at one time, Sarah?
:>> :>>
:>> :>> The same number as you, one or two. What do you find confusing?
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>That makes them "double beds".
:>>
:>> "double" is an actual size of beds and bedding in the US, groggy.
:>
:>
:>Sure, but in English speaking countries it's the number of people the
:>manufacturers expected would sleep in it.
And by having it as an actual size changes that how?

This may seem strange to you, but (in New Zealand) beds are subdivided
into those intended for one person (single) and those intended for two
people (double).
Once the customer decides which of those two categories he/she fits
into, then he/she has to decide which particular size variation he/she
wants; standard, queen, king ...

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>> :>- "standard".
:>> :>- "Queen".
:>> :>- "King".
:>>
:>> We have : http://interiordec.about.com/cs/beds/l/blbedsizes.htm
:>>
:>> Double
:>> Queen
:>> King
:>> California King
:>
:>
:>Are you sure that's not "double California queen" or "fat arsed yank"?
:>
:>
:>> :>- "Ken-scum size".
:>>
:>> Ken weighs less than you do, Greg.
:>
:>That seems unlikely - according to customary wisdom he's half as much
:>again as I am.
Customary wisdom has never been associated with you.
:>Add to that he's a foot shorter than me and that I'm a foot shorter than
:>I was pre-accident ...
Ken is 5'10" tall. That would make you 3'5" tall now.

Actually, it would make me 7'10" and 530lb.

I'm not.

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>> :>> < SNIP>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
:>> :>> :>> flaming aside....
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :> Flaming aside, I'm not beyond the occassional "Wow, I bet she'd be
:>> :>> :>something in bed!" thoughts.
:>> :>> :>(Must be a male thing)
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Hahahahaha !!! I'd say it fair to say most men think the way you do.
:>> :>> ;)
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>That's the nicest thing you've ever said to me!
:>>
:>> Don't go all soft on me groggy! ;)
:>
:>
:>Trust me Sarah, I'd never be hard on you!
:>(Eww yuck)
Double EWWWW and YUCK!

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:28:26 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>
:>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:00:42 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:54:32 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:26:43 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:36:50 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:41:20 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:22:46 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:26:49 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> and King size beds for guests.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>Err, how many people do you expect can sleep in them at one time, Sarah?
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> The same number as you, one or two. What do you find confusing?
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>That makes them "double beds".
:>> :>>
:>> :>> "double" is an actual size of beds and bedding in the US, groggy.
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Sure, but in English speaking countries it's the number of people the
:>> :>manufacturers expected would sleep in it.
:>>
:>> And by having it as an actual size changes that how?
:>
:>This may seem strange to you, but (in New Zealand) beds are subdivided
:>into those intended for one person (single) and those intended for two
:>people (double).
:>Once the customer decides which of those two categories he/she fits
:>into, then he/she has to decide which particular size variation he/she
:>wants; standard, queen, king ...

Same here, I gave you the link above.


:>> :>> :>They come in:
:>> :>> :>- "standard".
:>> :>> :>- "Queen".
:>> :>> :>- "King".
:>> :>>
:>> :>> We have : http://interiordec.about.com/cs/beds/l/blbedsizes.htm
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Double
:>> :>> Queen
:>> :>> King
:>> :>> California King
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Are you sure that's not "double California queen" or "fat arsed yank"?
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>> :>- "Ken-scum size".
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Ken weighs less than you do, Greg.
:>> :>
:>> :>That seems unlikely - according to customary wisdom he's half as much
:>> :>again as I am.
:>>
:>> Customary wisdom has never been associated with you.
:>>
:>> :>Add to that he's a foot shorter than me and that I'm a foot shorter than
:>> :>I was pre-accident ...
:>>
:>> Ken is 5'10" tall. That would make you 3'5" tall now.
:>Actually, it would make me 7'10" and 530lb.

Actually it would make you 6'10" and a fatfuck! You weigh 300lbs
more than Ken.

:>I'm not.
:>
:>>
:>> :>> :>> < SNIP>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
:>> :>> :>> :>> flaming aside....
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :> Flaming aside, I'm not beyond the occassional "Wow, I bet she'd be
:>> :>> :>> :>something in bed!" thoughts.
:>> :>> :>> :>(Must be a male thing)
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> Hahahahaha !!! I'd say it fair to say most men think the way you do.
:>> :>> :>> ;)
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>That's the nicest thing you've ever said to me!
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Don't go all soft on me groggy! ;)
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Trust me Sarah, I'd never be hard on you!
:>> :>(Eww yuck)
:>>
:>> Double EWWWW and YUCK!

[Greg Procter]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>
:>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> and King size beds for guests.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>Err, how many people do you expect can sleep in them at one time, Sarah?
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> The same number as you, one or two. What do you find confusing?
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>That makes them "double beds".
:>> :>>
:>> :>> "double" is an actual size of beds and bedding in the US, groggy.
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Sure, but in English speaking countries it's the number of people the
:>> :>manufacturers expected would sleep in it.
:>>
:>> And by having it as an actual size changes that how?
:>
:>This may seem strange to you, but (in New Zealand) beds are subdivided
:>into those intended for one person (single) and those intended for two
:>people (double).
:>Once the customer decides which of those two categories he/she fits
:>into, then he/she has to decide which particular size variation he/she
:>wants; standard, queen, king ...
Same here, I gave you the link above.

You just don't get it, do you - if something is obviously stupid, a link
proving it's accepted or stupid isn't worth viewing.

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>> :>> :>- "standard".
:>> :>> :>- "Queen".
:>> :>> :>- "King".
:>> :>>
:>> :>> We have : http://interiordec.about.com/cs/beds/l/blbedsizes.htm
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Double
:>> :>> Queen
:>> :>> King
:>> :>> California King
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>Are you sure that's not "double California queen" or "fat arsed yank"?
:>> :>
:>> :>
:>> :>> :>- "Ken-scum size".
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Ken weighs less than you do, Greg.
:>> :>
:>> :>That seems unlikely - according to customary wisdom he's half as much
:>> :>again as I am.
:>>
:>> Customary wisdom has never been associated with you.
:>>
:>> :>Add to that he's a foot shorter than me and that I'm a foot shorter than
:>> :>I was pre-accident ...
:>>
:>> Ken is 5'10" tall. That would make you 3'5" tall now.
:>Actually, it would make me 7'10" and 530lb.
Actually it would make you 6'10" and a fatfuck! You weigh 300lbs
more than Ken.

Neither your summation nor my joke is correct - I'm considerably taller
than Ken-scum and considerably lighter.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:51:19 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>
:>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:28:26 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:00:42 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:54:32 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:26:43 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:36:50 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:41:20 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:22:46 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:26:49 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +1300, Greg Procter <***@ihug.co.nz>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>- Do US bed makers make double beds
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What couple would sleep on a double bed, groggy? Is that all the bed
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> you can afford?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :><sigh>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>New Zealanders aren't into triple beds, Sarah -
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> What are Nu Zoolanders "into", groggy?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>When I was in the furniture shop the other weekend, the main choice
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>seemed to be between "Queen" and "King" sized beds.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> We here in the US prefer those two choices as well.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Here in New Zealand those are sub-categories of "double" as the design
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>intention is that they are for two people.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>You had apparently eliminated "double" from your choices.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> We have double beds here in the US but I'm hard pressed to remember
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> the last time I saw one in a mattress or bedding store. Most married
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> couples prefer either a Queen or King sized bed and hotels offer Queen
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> and King size beds for guests.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Duhh Sarah, "King" and "Queen" beds are double bed sizes.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> King and Queen sized beds are not double bed sizes here, groggy.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Err, how many people do you expect can sleep in them at one time, Sarah?
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> The same number as you, one or two. What do you find confusing?
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>That makes them "double beds".
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> "double" is an actual size of beds and bedding in the US, groggy.
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>Sure, but in English speaking countries it's the number of people the
:>> :>> :>manufacturers expected would sleep in it.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> And by having it as an actual size changes that how?
:>> :>
:>> :>This may seem strange to you, but (in New Zealand) beds are subdivided
:>> :>into those intended for one person (single) and those intended for two
:>> :>people (double).
:>> :>Once the customer decides which of those two categories he/she fits
:>> :>into, then he/she has to decide which particular size variation he/she
:>> :>wants; standard, queen, king ...
:>>
:>> Same here, I gave you the link above.
:>
:>
:>You just don't get it, do you - if something is obviously stupid, a link
:>proving it's accepted or stupid isn't worth viewing.

The link agrees with both my point and yours which are the same,
groggy.

Thanks for admitting you never looked just the same....


:>> :>> :>> :>They come in:
:>> :>> :>> :>- "standard".
:>> :>> :>> :>- "Queen".
:>> :>> :>> :>- "King".
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> We have : http://interiordec.about.com/cs/beds/l/blbedsizes.htm
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> Double
:>> :>> :>> Queen
:>> :>> :>> King
:>> :>> :>> California King
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>Are you sure that's not "double California queen" or "fat arsed yank"?
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>- "Ken-scum size".
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> Ken weighs less than you do, Greg.
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>That seems unlikely - according to customary wisdom he's half as much
:>> :>> :>again as I am.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Customary wisdom has never been associated with you.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>Add to that he's a foot shorter than me and that I'm a foot shorter than
:>> :>> :>I was pre-accident ...
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Ken is 5'10" tall. That would make you 3'5" tall now.
:>> :>Actually, it would make me 7'10" and 530lb.
:>>
:>> Actually it would make you 6'10" and a fatfuck! You weigh 300lbs
:>> more than Ken.
:>
:>Neither your summation nor my joke is correct - I'm considerably taller
:>than Ken-scum and considerably lighter.

You can lie all you'd like groggy but until we see photographic
evidence.....

[Beavershot Anderson]

Post by Greg Procter
Neither your summation nor my joke is correct - I'm considerably taller

Missing your testicles too, from what we hear.

Man, you are a mess.

OK children ... I'm pretty much out of here. Too busy with other
things.

See ya in court, Karen ;)

[ZapRat]

Post by Beavershot Anderson

Post by Greg Procter
Neither your summation nor my joke is correct - I'm considerably taller

Missing your testicles too, from what we hear.
Man, you are a mess.
OK children ... I'm pretty much out of here. Too busy with other
things.
See ya in court, Karen ;)

How did the lawsuit you threatened with 2.5 years ago turn out for you?



Apparently acting as Moffitt Corporation's spokesperson since he
transmitted the following (unedited) message through a posting host
registered to them, John Wesley Gilmer III, aka, "PirateJohn",
"PyrateJohn", and the additional alias utilized below, stated:



From: Yellow-Eyed-***@hushmail.com
Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration
Subject: Re: Internet postings targeted in court
Date: 4 Nov 2005 13:04:23 -0800
Message-ID: <***@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.177.232.245

<< Do you remember "American Kernel"? >>

LOL! Another card carrying racist. He'll never work in legitimate
politics again, not unless he takes on an assumed name and keeps a
very, very low profile.

And it's funny, because I have a copy of his resume right here on my
desk, whether you believe it or not ;)

There's a lesson to be learned there, Racist Ferret. You threatened me
and my family a year or more ago. We duly reported you to the local
cops, and then basically said "Fuck Hardman, he hasn't got any balls."
And we were right.

You, Maxx, Alcibiades, and your disgusting pals are the racists. You
are the bad people, not those of us working to keep you racists and
white supremacists in check.

And we are winning ;)

Thanks for playing Hardman. You can "wait and see" how this silly
lawsuit goes in Maryland. Once again, it's irrelevent. Totally
irrelevent. Not only is bringing a light on trash like you 100% legal,
but in order to file a complaint you would have to do it in my home
state. And you would have to step forward and identify yourself. And
prove that I defamed you, which is going to be pretty hard to do since
everything that I say about you comes from either your admissions in
newsgroups or public records.

And if you want any support from Maxx and Alcibiades you would have to
identify them, too. And that should be funnier than Hell, as they come
kicking and screaming out of hiding ;)

But all of this is moot, since you haven't got 25 cent$ to rub
together. If there is going to be any suing it will be me suing you
and I know that you don't have any assets.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:12:07 -0700, "GodHatesKaren"
<http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> wrote:

:>See? This is why I have kill-filed the arrogant slodder slut. She has
:>nothing worthwhile to say except to bully other people and always keep them
:>on the defensive. I see more than enough of the old dyke when others reply
:>to her.

Who is being bullied and on the defensive here? Lumpy?

Ok Lumpy = Karen " SkanKy Ho " Anderson.
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

Apparently you've forgotten that the claim has always been " Karen
Anderson doesn't post here. ".

See how difficult it is to keep your convoluted lies straight?

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:15:16 -0700, "GodHatesKaren"
<***@http//www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm > wrote:


:>{{ Fart }}

BwahahahahaHAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW !!!!

Stop posting gifs to a non-binary newsgroup, you retarded shitass. ;)

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:51:47 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
<***@seemehere_ http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm>
wrote:

:>What a

Swine you are, Karen.
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:06:09 -0700, "GodHatesKaren"
<Seeme@ http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> wrote:

:>>Jose Gaspar wrote: I'm gay and proud so what?

:>Oh shit.....you've gone too far, Jose.

Uh huh....

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:49:31 -0700 (PDT),
***@seeMeHere<http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm>
wrote:

:>On Mar 27, 7:14 am, Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:> 
:>>
:>> They claim Ken has stolen " Sarah Czepiel's " identity and been using
:>> it on usenet for 15 years.   Now they claim I'm supposed to be living
:>> in Colorado.   Even you and nuthatch Nicky didn't hatch scenarios
:>> that ridiculous.
:>
:>For one thing, the Czepiel thing didn't show up till recently, when
:>the Big Slip Up happened and Ken had to invent a wife,

How do you explain the property that Sarah owns in Maryland?

Hmmm?

How do you think someone can buy land, an office building, two cars,
and have them all in the name of some random woman living in RI ?

Do you think ownership is done anonymously, without the use of
Attorneys, Banks, land surveyors, tax offices, DMV's, etc....?

Do you want us to believe not one of all these people involved has
ever noticed the person behind the name doesn't match the photo
identification, the DL, the bank accounts, etc.....???

I've read your medical records Karen. Like you, sifting though
Salvation Army clothing bins for your next stained dress, it's ugly
and sordid; the history of a decrepit 70 year old woman suffering from
debilitating and lifelong mental illness.

Bet you wish you'd never set these disgusting pictures to people.
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Jose Gaspar]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:49:31 -0700 (PDT),
:> 
:>>
:>> They claim Ken has stolen " Sarah Czepiel's " identity and been using
:>> it on usenet for 15 years.   Now they claim I'm supposed to be living
:>> in Colorado.   Even you and nuthatch Nicky didn't hatch scenarios
:>> that ridiculous.
:>
:>For one thing, the Czepiel thing didn't show up till recently, when
:>the Big Slip Up happened and Ken had to invent a wife,
How do you explain the property that Sarah owns in Maryland?

You slipped up again, Ken... You posted as Sarah, remember?

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 27 Mar 2008 12:30:38 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com>
wrote:

:>In article <***@4ax.com>, Sarah Czepiel says...
:>>
:>>On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:49:31 -0700 (PDT),
:>>***@seeMeHere<http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm>
:>>wrote:
:>>
:>>:>On Mar 27, 7:14 am, Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>>:> 
:>>:>>
:>>:>> They claim Ken has stolen " Sarah Czepiel's " identity and been using
:>>:>> it on usenet for 15 years.   Now they claim I'm supposed to be living
:>>:>> in Colorado.   Even you and nuthatch Nicky didn't hatch scenarios
:>>:>> that ridiculous.
:>>:>
:>>:>For one thing, the Czepiel thing didn't show up till recently, when
:>>:>the Big Slip Up happened and Ken had to invent a wife,
:>>
:>>How do you explain the property that Sarah owns in Maryland?
:>
:>You slipped up again, Ken... You posted as Sarah, remember?

No mistake.

Now answer the questions.

How do you think someone can buy land, an office building, two cars,
and have them all in the name of some random woman living in RI ?

Do you think ownership is done anonymously, without the use of
Attorneys, Banks, land surveyors, tax offices, DMV's, etc....?

Do you want us to believe not one of all these people involved has
ever noticed the person behind the name doesn't match the photo
identification, the DL, the bank accounts, etc.....???

I've read your medical records Karen. Like you, sifting though
Salvation Army clothing bins for your next stained dress, it's ugly
and sordid; the history of a decrepit 70 year old woman suffering from
debilitating and lifelong mental illness.

Bet you wish you'd never set these disgusting pictures to people.
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Jose Gaspar]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>
:>>On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:49:31 -0700 (PDT),
:>>
:>>:> 
:>>:>>
:>>:>> They claim Ken has stolen " Sarah Czepiel's " identity and been using
:>>:>> it on usenet for 15 years.   Now they claim I'm supposed to be living
:>>:>> in Colorado.   Even you and nuthatch Nicky didn't hatch scenarios
:>>:>> that ridiculous.
:>>:>
:>>:>For one thing, the Czepiel thing didn't show up till recently, when
:>>:>the Big Slip Up happened and Ken had to invent a wife,
:>>
:>>How do you explain the property that Sarah owns in Maryland?
:>
:>You slipped up again, Ken... You posted as Sarah, remember?
No mistake.

The only person I know of who talks about himself in the third person is the
demented John Gilmer... Creepy...

Post by Sarah Czepiel
Now answer the questions.
How do you think someone can buy land, an office building, two cars,
and have them all in the name of some random woman living in RI ?

No one would write about themself like this, Ken... You are too delusional to
know it... You are NOT a woman, Ken...

GET HELP!

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 27 Mar 2008 13:23:15 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com>
wrote:

:>No one would write about themself like this, Ken... You are too delusional to
:>know it... You are NOT a woman, Ken...

Of course he's NOT a woman.

Now answer the questions.

How do you think someone can buy land, an office building, two cars,
and have them all in the name of some random woman living in RI ?

Do you think ownership is done anonymously, without the use of
Attorneys, Banks, land surveyors, tax offices, DMV's, etc....?

Do you want us to believe not one of all these people involved has
ever noticed the person behind the name doesn't match the photo
identification, the DL, the bank accounts, etc.....???

I've read your medical records Karen. Like you, sifting though
Salvation Army clothing bins for your next stained dress, it's ugly
and sordid; the history of a decrepit 70 year old woman suffering from
debilitating and lifelong mental illness.

Bet you wish you'd never set these disgusting pictures to people.
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Lumpy]

How do you explain the property that Sarah owns in Maryland?  

Nice pratfall, Ken.


Why don't you just give up the ruse and get on with it. There isn't a
single person anywhere who believes in the sara/h routine, and you
don't have the acuity to keep the game going anymore.

Next thing, we'll see you posting as Ken and talking about your
"sons".

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:31:16 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
<***@seemehere_ http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

:>Nice

Your pictures induce projectile vomiting.
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 27 Mar 2008 09:57:36 -0700, Jose Gaspar
<***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:>Path: forte-easynews!core-iad-easynews!news-in-02-iad.easynews.com!s02-b18.iad01!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn
:>From: Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com>
:>Newsgroups: alt.nuke.the.usa
:>Subject: Re: Island Girly ......
:>Date: 27 Mar 2008 09:57:36 -0700
:>Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95
:>Lines: 30
:>Message-ID: <***@drn.newsguy.com>
:>References: <***@4ax.com> <***@ihug.co.nz> <c28303d4-bd23-4322-b55a-***@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
:>NNTP-Posting-Host: p970200000010064844931a84508b29d22729af501278bc2d.newsdawg.com
:>User-Agent: Direct Read News 5.16
:>Xref: core-iad-easynews alt.nuke.the.usa:423820
:>X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080327-0, 03/27/2008), Inbound message
:>X-Antivirus-Status: Clean

[Dave Witmarsh]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On 27 Mar 2008 09:57:36 -0700, Jose Gaspar
:>Path: forte-easynews!core-iad-easynews!news-in-02-iad.easynews.com!s02-b18.iad01!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn
:>Newsgroups: alt.nuke.the.usa
:>Subject: Re: Island Girly ......
:>Date: 27 Mar 2008 09:57:36 -0700
:>Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95
:>Lines: 30
:>NNTP-Posting-Host: p970200000010064844931a84508b29d22729af501278bc2d.newsdawg.com
:>User-Agent: Direct Read News 5.16
:>Xref: core-iad-easynews alt.nuke.the.usa:423820
:>X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080327-0, 03/27/2008), Inbound message
:>X-Antivirus-Status: Clean

Sarah "Sybil" Czepiel - queen of the PKB people :)

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 27 Mar 2008 12:24:36 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com>
wrote:

:>In article <***@4ax.com>, Sarah Czepiel says...
:>>
:>>On 27 Mar 2008 09:57:36 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com>
:>>wrote:
:>>
:>>:>In article
:>><c28303d4-bd23-4322-b55a-***@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
:>>:>Lumpy says...
:>>:>>
:>>:>>On Mar 27, 5:57=A0am, Anthropy <***@bogus.com> wrote:
:>>:>>
:>>:>>>
:>>:>>> And your IP would be.........?
:>>:>>
:>>:>>I just assumed that his IP would be in there. So there's no way of
:>>:>>comparing the Ken IP and the Sarah IP?
:>>:>>
:>>:>>So that seals it.
:>>:>>
:>>:>>Not that it needed any further proof, but it's still fun to find out.
:>>:>
:>>:>Both the Ken IP and the 'Sarah' IP are hidden. There is no way to determine
:>>:>from the headers if the posts are coming from the same computer or different
:>>:>computers. However logic and common sense will tell you that there is only
:>>one
:>>:>computer since Ken & 'Sarah' NEVER post at the same time - one ALWAYS follow
:>>the
:>>:>other. The newer operating systems allow one person to switch between two
:>>:>running programs as fast as the operator can click a mouse. With 'Sarah'
:>>:>posting as close as 22 seconds behind Ken, common sense would dictate that Ken
:>>:>is switching from his Usenetmonster account to his Easynews account with a
:>>:>simple click on his computer.
:>>
:>>I don't have an Easynews account, "Jose".
:>>So much for your sleuthing ability and reading headers....
:>
:>What sex are you claiming to be now, Ken? Easynews is one of your accounts...

Look again dumbass. I DO NOT HAVE an Easynews account.

:>>:> Both usenet accounts use the 2.0/32.652 version
:>>:>of Forte Agent. Both accounts are running the same antivirus program, Avast!,
:>>:>which is a not too popular free download program.
:>>
:>>40 million?
:>
:>>October 22, 2007 - For Immediate Release: ALWIL Software a.s. is
:>>pleased to announce the registration of the 40 millionth user of its
:>>multiple award-winning avast! Home Edition antivirus software.
:>
:>In Europe!

Are they counted differently?

:>>:>Conclusion:
:>>:>There is no 'Sarah' posting to usenet. It is Ken using the name, 'Sarah
:>>:>Czepiel.'
:>>
:>>You admit then you have sullied, and libeled a completely innocent
:>>woman and her family.
:>
:>Stop whining, Ken...
:>
:>>I'm calling Bill Czepiel. He needs to get involved with this now.
:>
:>Oh, please do... And tell him how you claim to be Sarah...
:>
:>There is no Sarah Czepiel posting to usenet, Ken. I don't expect you to fess up
:>to it but we know that you are a very weird fucker...

HAwwwwWWWWWWWWWWWW HA HA HA HawWWWWWWWWWWWW HA HA HA !!!

You honestly think I'm going to lose sleep because some dipshit using
an anonymous nym says I don't exist? You losers have been wrong on
everything your entire life so why break the streak. You're one of
three people who are all too ashamed to use your real names. You're
either:

A. The crazy whore Karen Anderson
B. The Jail House Squealer Bill Schenley
or...
C. The Fat loser from Wisconsin Billy Cmelak.

We all know there's a reason why you get evicted from your apartments,
spend time in jail for drug use, and get committed to mental
hospitals. The weird fuckers are looking back at you from your own
mirrors. ;)

[Jose Gaspar]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>There is no Sarah Czepiel posting to usenet, Ken. I don't expect you to fess up
:>to it but we know that you are a very weird fucker...
HAwwwwWWWWWWWWWWWW HA HA HA HawWWWWWWWWWWWW HA HA HA !!!
You honestly think I'm going to lose sleep because some dipshit using
an anonymous nym says I don't exist?

You do exist, Ken... But you are NOT a woman... Get over it...

Post by Sarah Czepiel
You're one of
three people who are all too ashamed to use your real names. You're
A. The crazy whore Karen Anderson
B. The Jail House Squealer Bill Schenley
or...
C. The Fat loser from Wisconsin Billy Cmelak.

Nope... you're just pissing in the wind, Ken...

Sarah could easily prove who she is but you are not proving anything... You
jump up and down and squeal but you haven't proved anything...

It's easy to do... just show us some REAL proof that you are NOT Ken...

Other than that, just STFU...

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 27 Mar 2008 13:57:21 -0700, Karen Anderson socking as Jose Gaspar
<http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm > wrote:

:>
:>You do exist, Ken... But you are NOT a woman...

Of course KEN is not a woman.

*YOU* OTOH defend your behavior here:
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm


:>>You're one of three people who are all too ashamed to use your real names. You're
:>>either:
:>>
:>>A. The crazy whore Karen Anderson
:>>B. The Jail House Squealer Bill Schenley
:>>or...
:>>C. The Fat loser from Wisconsin Billy Cmelak.
:>
:>Nope...

Yep.

:>Sarah could easily prove who she is but you are not proving anything... You
:>jump up and down and squeal but you haven't proved anything...
:>
:>It's easy to do... just show us some REAL proof that you are NOT Ken...

You're a poor fisherman, "Jose".

:>Other than that, just STFU...

You silly anonymous pussy. I know you got stuffed when you went
looking for info on me. Ain't RI a wonderful state? They tell
frustrated assholes like you to GET FUCKED when you desperately seek
info and now you're pounding out your frustrations on usenet.

Btw, a real Vietnam war vet would call Bill and tell him his wife's
name is being used on usenet. Of course since you are neither a
veteran nor honorable you'll ignore it all and continue to hide behind
an anonymous nym.

BOO! ;)

[Jose Gaspar]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On 27 Mar 2008 13:57:21 -0700, Karen Anderson socking as Jose Gaspar
:>
:>You do exist, Ken... But you are NOT a woman...
Of course KEN is not a woman.

That's what I said, Ken. Why be redundant?

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>You're one of three people who are all too ashamed to use your real names.
You're
:>>
:>>A. The crazy whore Karen Anderson
:>>B. The Jail House Squealer Bill Schenley
:>>or...
:>>C. The Fat loser from Wisconsin Billy Cmelak.
:>
:>Nope...
Yep.

Nope...

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>Sarah could easily prove who she is but you are not proving anything... You
:>jump up and down and squeal but you haven't proved anything...
:>
:>It's easy to do... just show us some REAL proof that you are NOT Ken...
You're a poor fisherman, "Jose".

I'm not fishing, Ken...

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>Other than that, just STFU...
You silly anonymous pussy.

Sorry if it upsets you that I'm anonymous...

Now, back to the point...

Prove that you're any other person except Ken Ehrett... It's really easy to do,
Ken... Rather than run your fucking mouth like a fish sucking water, just come
up with the proof...

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 27 Mar 2008 15:43:29 -0700, ***@seemygirlfriendhere:
<http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> blubbered:

:>>You're a poor fisherman, "Jose".
:>
:>I'm not fishing, Ken...

Youse a * starving * fisherman...

Suffer Little " Jose". ;)

[Jose Gaspar]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
:>>You're a poor fisherman, "Jose".
:>
:>I'm not fishing, Ken...
Youse a * starving * fisherman...
Suffer Little " Jose". ;)

Not at all, Ken... I know that you are not Sarah. I just wanted you to admit
it by absentia...

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 27 Mar 2008 17:33:36 -0700, Jose " Gay and Proud!" Gaspar
<***@newsguy.com> wrote:

: I know that you are not Sarah. I just wanted you to see my advanced
:>dementia...

uh huh.....

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:48:49 -0700, "GodHatesLumpy"
<***@http//www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm>
wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>> On 27 Mar 2008 12:24:36 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com>
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>>>> In article <***@4ax.com>, Sarah
:>>>> Czepiel says...
:>>>>>
:>>>>> On 27 Mar 2008 09:57:36 -0700, Jose Gaspar
:>>>>> <***@newsguy.com> wrote:
:>>>>>
:>>>>>>> In article
:>>>>> <c28303d4-bd23-4322-b55a-***@....
:>>>>>>> Lumpy says...
:>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>> On Mar 27, 5:57=A0am, Anthropy <***@bogus.com> wrote:
:>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>>> And your IP would be.........?
:>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>> I just assumed that his IP would be in there. So there's no
:>>>>>>>> way of comparing the Ken IP and the Sarah IP?
:>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>> So that seals it.
:>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>> Not that it needed any further proof, but it's still fun to
:>>>>>>>> find out.
:>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>> Both the Ken IP and the 'Sarah' IP are hidden. There is no
:>>>>>>> way to determine from the headers if the posts are coming from
:>>>>>>> the same computer or different computers. However logic and
:>>>>>>> common sense will tell you that there is only one computer
:>>>>>>> since Ken & 'Sarah' NEVER post at the same time - one ALWAYS
:>>>>>>> follow the other. The newer operating systems allow one
:>>>>>>> person to switch between two running programs as fast as the
:>>>>>>> operator can click a mouse. With 'Sarah' posting as close as
:>>>>>>> 22 seconds behind Ken, common sense would dictate that Ken is
:>>>>>>> switching from his Usenetmonster account to his Easynews
:>>>>>>> account with a simple click on his computer.
:>>>>>
:>>>>> I don't have an Easynews account, "Jose".
:>>>>> So much for your sleuthing ability and reading headers....
:>>>>
:>>>> What sex are you claiming to be now, Ken? Easynews is one of
:>>>> your accounts...
:>>
:>> Look again dumbass. I DO NOT HAVE an Easynews account.
:>
:>Your next post indicates that you DO: <SPANK!!>

Look *AGAIN* dumbass. I DO NOT HAVE an Easynews account.
Easynews is the down source server, ya dumb cunt.

<SPANK!>


Gawd but you're a dumb LOSER, Karen.

[Lumpy]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
flaming aside....

Oh, for the love of Christ. You're so depersonalized that you have no
context to see yourself in, much less anyone else.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:18:41 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
<http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> wrote:

:>Oh, for the love of Christ.

You're disgusting, Karen.
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm Bet you wish you'd
never sent that Priority Mail package to John. ;0

:>You're so depersonalized that you have no context to see yourself in, much less anyone else.

Blubbers Karen Anderson, Schizophrenic Stalker who claimed Ken left a
"wife" named Robyn in Missouri so he could be with Deborah Lynch. You
haven't been on the sane side of reality since you were a teenager.

At least that's what your medical records show.

[Sarah Cybil Czepiel]

In article <a2b7236a-dc7c-4c88-8dc5-***@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Lumpy says...

Post by Lumpy

Post by Sarah Czepiel
I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
flaming aside....

Oh, for the love of Christ. You're so depersonalized that you have no
context to see yourself in, much less anyone else.

You have no idea what my mother did to me...

[Lumpy]

Post by Sarah Cybil Czepiel
Lumpy says...

Post by Sarah Czepiel
I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
flaming aside....

Oh, for the love of Christ.  You're so depersonalized that you have no
context to see yourself in, much less anyone else.

You have no idea what my mother did to me...

Isn't she the one who weighs less than 100 pounds and that's why Ken
has a Handicap Plate?

[Greg Procter]

Post by Lumpy

Post by Sarah Cybil Czepiel
Lumpy says...

Post by Lumpy

Post by Sarah Czepiel
I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
flaming aside....

Oh, for the love of Christ. You're so depersonalized that you have no
context to see yourself in, much less anyone else.

You have no idea what my mother did to me...

Isn't she the one who weighs less than 100 pounds and that's why Ken
has a Handicap Plate?

Gun wielding 300lb Ken-scum got beaten up by a 100lb OAP grandmother?

That can't have done much for his self-esteem.

[Jose Gaspar]

In article <50fa5a55-0335-4bd9-bdbc-***@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Lumpy says...

Post by Lumpy
com>,

Post by Sarah Cybil Czepiel
Lumpy says...

Post by Sarah Czepiel
I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
flaming aside....

Oh, for the love of Christ. =A0You're so depersonalized that you have no
context to see yourself in, much less anyone else.

You have no idea what my mother did to me...

Isn't she the one who weighs less than 100 pounds and that's why Ken
has a Handicap Plate?

Sailors gave him a blanket party on board ship as he crossed the equator. He's
been limping ever since. That was before the don't ask - don't tell policy...

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 25 Mar 2008 21:05:39 -0700, Jose " I fuck SkanKy Karen Anderson"
Gaspar < http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm > wrote:

:>Sailors

Are repulsed by Karen Anderson's Stinkhole...
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm


------

On 20 Mar 2008 20:50:42 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:>Heartguard. Works good for heartworms, roundworms, and hookworms... Doesn't do
:>much for her tapeworm though... you can tell from the photos...
:>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Dave Witmarsh]

On 25 Mar 2008 20:06:24 -0700, Sarah Cybil Czepiel

Post by Sarah Cybil Czepiel
Lumpy says...

Post by Lumpy

Post by Sarah Czepiel
I don't wonder about others sex lives regardless of location, antu
flaming aside....

Oh, for the love of Christ. You're so depersonalized that you have no
context to see yourself in, much less anyone else.

You have no idea what my mother did to me...

Steady now feller...Sarah will start calling you "Ricky" and fantasise
that she's had your account nuked...

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 27 Mar 2008 10:02:26 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com>
wrote:

:>In article <712d4ca3-976b-4b60-b4a8-***@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
:>Lumpy says...
:>>
:>>On Mar 27, 5:58=A0am, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com> wrote:
:>>
:>>>
:>>> She's in the apartments on Encanto Place, Montrose, Colorado... =A0I doubt=
:>> that
:>>> she knows Ken is using her name...
:>>
:>>LOL.
:>
:>It is the Cottonwood Apartments, a Section 8 housing project for the poor. She
:>is not renting the apartment (102) under her name.
:>
:>http://www.montrosepress.com/articles/2008/02/12/news/doc47b268597f96f843740315.txt
:>
:>http://www.monroegroupltd.com/propertyDetail.php?id=15

Yo Lumpy,

Get your Secret video taper from the League of Woman Voters on a plane
RIGHT NOW!! We need more video! Oh wait.....we never had any video
have we?

HAWwwwwwwwwwWWWWWWWWWWWW HA HA HA HaWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW !!!!

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:32:58 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
<http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> lied:


" I've arranged to have you video'd during your arrival for the court
appearance on that ticket coming up on the 17th. You won't see it
being done, but the individual will be in the courtroom and will
report. hehh. $125.00. "

" Film at 11. "

------

Where is the VIDEO you lying SkanKy whore?? ;)

[Lumpy]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
------
Where is the VIDEO you lying SkanKy whore??   ;)  

I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!! WHAT??????? TYPE LOUDER!!!

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:09:33 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
<http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> lied:


" I've arranged to have you video'd during your arrival for the court
appearance on that ticket coming up on the 17th. You won't see it
being done, but the individual will be in the courtroom and will
report. hehh. $125.00. "

" Film at 11. "

------

Where is the VIDEO you lying SkanKy whore?? ;)

[ZapRat]

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:09:33 -0700 (PDT), Pyrate/PirateJohn Gilmer
" I've arranged to have you video'd during your arrival for the court
appearance on that ticket coming up on the 17th. You won't see it
being done, but the individual will be in the courtroom and will
report. hehh. $125.00. "
" Film at 11. "
------
Where is the VIDEO you lying Skanky whore?? ;)

By the way, has the plaintiff's lawyer advised you about their preferred
way to perjure yourself while on the "witless" stand?

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:26:48 -0500, Fat Billy Cmelak socking as ZapRat
<***@newsguy.com> slithered forward to defend SkanKy Karen
Anderson with:

:>Sarah Czepiel said the following on 3/25/2008 6:36 AM:
:>
:> > On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:09:33 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
:> > <http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> lied:
:> >
:> >
:> > " I've arranged to have you video'd during your arrival for the court
:> > appearance on that ticket coming up on the 17th. You won't see it
:> > being done, but the individual will be in the courtroom and will
:> > report. hehh. $125.00. "
:> >
:> > " Film at 11. "
:> >
:> > ------
:> >
:> > Where is the VIDEO you lying Skanky whore?? ;)
:> >
:> >
:>
:>
:>By the way, has the plaintiff's lawyer advised you about their preferred
:>way to perjure yourself while on the "witless" stand?

Where has all your bravado and confidence of a week ago gone, Hoodoo?
;)


------

On 20 Mar 2008 20:50:42 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:>Heartguard. Works good for heartworms, roundworms, and hookworms... Doesn't do
:>much for her tapeworm though... you can tell from the photos...
:>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[ZapRat]

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:32:58 -0700 (PDT), Pyrate/PirateJohn Gilmer
" I've arranged to have you video'd during your arrival for the court
appearance on that ticket coming up on the 17th. You won't see it
being done, but the individual will be in the courtroom and will
report. hehh. $125.00. "
" Film at 11. "
------
Where is the VIDEO you lying SkanKy whore?? ;)

Redundancy is an obvious trait of a dunce such as yourself.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 24 Mar 2008 16:54:15 -0700, Jose "I fuck Goats" Gaspar
<***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:>In article <***@4ax.com>, Sarah Czepiel
:> says: "Jose" loves skanky old Karen Anderson Stalker
:> http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

Uh huh....


------

On 20 Mar 2008 20:50:42 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:>Heartguard. Works good for heartworms, roundworms, and hookworms... Doesn't do
:>much for her tapeworm though... you can tell from the photos...
:>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Jose Gaspar]

In article <***@4ax.com>, Ken Ehrett says...

Ken says: "Give me that fat, ugly bitch, Deborah Lynch of Hometown Realty,
Jacksonville Florida. She needs me BAD... Her man, John Gilmer of Moffitt
Corporation, Jacksonville Florida can't satisfy her with his second hand used
dildo..."

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 24 Mar 2008 20:22:46 -0700, Jose "I fuck This Dog" Gaspar
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

:>On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:01:40 -0400, Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>
:>On 24 Mar 2008 16:54:15 -0700, Jose "I fuck Goats" Gaspar
:><***@newsguy.com> wrote:
:>
:>:>In article <***@4ax.com>, Sarah Czepiel
:>:> says: "Jose" loves skanky old Karen Anderson Stalker
:>:> http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm
:>
:>Ken says....Karen Beavershot Anderson is a fat swine :>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

Uh huh...

[Jose Gaspar]

In article <***@4ax.com>, Ken Ehrett says...
Ken says: "I want some of that Deborah Lynch pussy... I love fat slobs..."

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 24 Mar 2008 21:08:13 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com>
wrote:

:> "I want some of that Karen Anderson pussy... I love fat slobs..."

uh huh....

[ZapRat]

On 24 Mar 2008 21:08:13 -0700, BuccaneerJuan Gilmer
:> "I want some of that Karen Anderson pussy... I am a fat slob..."
uh huh....

You would know.

[Jose Gaspar]

Post by ZapRat

On 24 Mar 2008 21:08:13 -0700, BuccaneerJuan Gilmer
:> "I want some of that Karen Anderson pussy... I am a fat slob..."
uh huh....

You would know.

Let me see if I got this right...

1. PirateJohn owns a motorhome free and clear in his name.
2. Deborah Lynch The Embezzler swindled the mortgage company and made off with
$75,000 cash in hand.
3. PJ & Deb have no mortgages (read: own no property).
4. PJ $ Deb pay a small fee to rent a couple of sheds where they park their old
bus in the Jacksonville crack house slum district.
5. Pirate John works full time and recently got promoted.
6. Deborah Lynch is closing on house sales left and right.

BUT... they will have to save money for 2 fucking years before they can afford
to go to Mexico...

What's wrong with this picture folks? How much can it possibly cost to stay in
an old bus in a third world country? All it could possibly cost is the price of
diesel fuel and a 1500 pound box of french fries...

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 25 Mar 2008 11:48:01 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com>
wrote:

:>In article <***@newsguy.com>, ZapRat says...
:>>
:>> > On 24 Mar 2008 21:08:13 -0700, Jose Gaspar wrote:
:>> >
:>> > :> "I want some of that Karen Anderson pussy... I am a fat slob..."
:>> >
:>> > uh huh....
:>>
:>>
:>>
:>>You would know.
:>
:>Let me see if I got this right... http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

Uh huh....

------

On 20 Mar 2008 20:50:42 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:>Heartguard. Works good for heartworms, roundworms, and hookworms... Doesn't do
:>much for her tapeworm though... you can tell from the photos...
:>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:58:51 -0700, "GodHatesKaren"
<http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> wrote:

:>vile vomit http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

uh huh....

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:25:40 -0500, Fat Billy Cmelak socking as ZapRat
<***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:> "I want some of that Karen Anderson pussy... I am a fat slob..."

Perfect title for that SkanKy whores pictures:

The Stalker's Stinkhole -
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm





------

On 20 Mar 2008 20:50:42 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com> wrote:

:>Heartguard. Works good for heartworms, roundworms, and hookworms... Doesn't do
:>much for her tapeworm though... you can tell from the photos...
:>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

[ZapRat]

On 24 Mar 2008 20:22:46 -0700, BuccaneerJuan "I fuck This Dog" Deborah
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/
:>
:>On 24 Mar 2008 16:54:15 -0700, BuccaneerJuan "I fuck Goats" Gilmer
:>
:>:> says: "BuccaneerJuan" loves skanky fat Deborah Lynch
:>:> http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/
:>
:>Ken says....Deborah Beavershot Lynch is a fat swine :>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/
Uh huh...

You bet!

[ZapRat]

On 24 Mar 2008 16:54:15 -0700, BuccaneerJuan "I fuck Goats" Gilmer
:>Czepiel
:> says: "BuccaneerJuan" loves skanky fat Deborah Lynch
:> http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/
Uh huh....
------
:>Heartguard. Works good for heartworms, roundworms, and hookworms...
:>Doesn't do
:>much for her tapeworm though... you can tell from the photos...
:>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/

Redundancy is an obvious trait of a dunce such as yourself.

[M Cord]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On 24 Mar 2008 16:54:15 -0700, Jose "I fuck Goats" Gaspar
:>Czepiel
:> says: "Jose" loves skanky old Karen Anderson Stalker
:> http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm
Uh huh....
------
:>Heartguard. Works good for heartworms, roundworms, and hookworms...
:>Doesn't do much for her tapeworm though... you can tell from the
:>photos... http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm

Fuck! My eyes. Icepick time... God damn she's fucking ugly.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:32:18 +0000 (UTC), M Cord
<***@excite.co.jp> wrote:

:>>:>photos... http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm
:>
:>Fuck! My eyes. Icepick time... God damn she's fucking ugly.

All you ever need to know about Karen Anderson is on that link. ;)

[Sarah Czepiel]

On 28 Mar 2008 06:33:57 -0700, Jose Gaspar <***@newsguy.com>
wrote:

:>In article <***@ihug.co.nz>, Greg Procter says...
:>>
:>>Jose Gaspar wrote:
:>>>
:>>> You do know there is no Sarah Czepiel posting, right?
:>>
:>>
:>>Hi Jose,
:>>
:>>The question of is Sarah Czepiel Ken-scum?
:>>I don't know, I don't care.
:>>However, I do see consistant differences between the two characters'
:>>attitudes.
:>>IMHO Ken-scum isn't intelligent enough to have maintained those
:>>character differences over more than 5 years.
:>>Perhaps Sarah is the real Ken-scum and Ken-scum is her made-up thicko
:>>nym - Sarah actually being the real Ken-scum.
:>>However, I also don't think she could maintain the subtle (and I use
:>>that word advisedly) differences, because that would require her/him to
:>>understand both personas to a degree he/she does not seem capable of.
:>>I can insult Sarah regarding her lack of humanity and get a rise - I
:>>insult Ken-scum in the same manner and he thinks I'm trying to make
:>>friends.
:>>
:>>
:>>Bottom line, I don't know, can't know, don't care.
:>
:>You may be a witness to one of the most unique psychological aberrations of all
:>time. The subtle differences you speak of may not have anything to do with
:>intelligence or the ability (or lack thereof) to sustain separate personas. I
:>see only one organism that is both male and female, albeit the female version
:>needs more than a little polishing. This organism desperately wants others to
:>believe it is two separate individuals, however is fails to provide even the
:>slightest evidence. When John Gilmer invited 'Sara' to AFJ-B, Ken said John
:>invited HIM. Later Ken said John invited 'US.' Neither was true. Just
:>yesterday Ken said 'Sarah' owned property while he was posting as 'Sarah.' If
:>it was Sarah posting, she would have said, *I* own property. I know for a fact
:>that Sarah (the real Sarah) is associated with an apartment in Colorado.
:>
:>Never-the-less I do understand that you don't care. For me, I don't have the
:>time to spat with whatever it is.

:>Take care...

HawWWWWWWWWWWWWW HAHAHAHAHA !!!

Uh huh.....

And with that the traveling clown slinks away...

Bye-bye, shitass. ;)

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:45:00 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
<***@lumpo.hvn> wrote:

:>Sarah has absolutely NO credibility as the person
:>she claims to be...and she refuses to provide a shred of evidence...just her
:>harsh demands that she be believed.

Can you pick up the telephone? Call me. 301-884-0106 Collect.

Here's your chance.

Of course if you don't call then we'll all know you and yours are the
liars.

I'm home now. 14:16 hrs.

[Lumpy]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:45:00 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
:>Sarah has absolutely NO credibility as the person
:>she claims to be...and she refuses to provide a shred of evidence...just her
:>harsh demands that she be believed.
Can you pick up the telephone?   Call me.   301-884-0106   Collect.
Here's your chance.  
Of course if you don't call then we'll all know you and yours are the
liars.
I'm home now.   14:16 hrs.  

No one is going to call you. EVER. You are no more to be trusted than
a snarling, desperate attack dog, mad with pain and fear. You'd use
the call as a weapon against the caller, and everyone knows that.
Well, except you. You can't even recognize the face in your mirror as
human.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy
<***@gmail.com> wrote:

:>On Mar 28, 11:16 am, Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:45:00 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
:>>
:>> <***@lumpo.hvn> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>Sarah has absolutely NO credibility as the person
:>> :>she claims to be...and she refuses to provide a shred of evidence...just her
:>> :>harsh demands that she be believed.
:>>
:>> Can you pick up the telephone?   Call me.   301-884-0106   Collect.
:>>
:>> Here's your chance.  
:>>
:>> Of course if you don't call then we'll all know you and yours are the
:>> liars.
:>>
:>> I'm home now.   14:16 hrs.  
:>
:>No one is going to call you. EVER.

Because you know to do so would mean your existence here ends.

:>You are no more to be trusted than a snarling, desperate attack dog, mad with pain
:>and fear. You'd use the call as a weapon against the caller, and everyone knows that.

If I'm supposed to me so mad with pain and fear why is it YOU won't
make a collect phone call? Other than the truth what are you so
terrified of, Karen? Do you think I'll grab you by the throat and
yank you through the telephone?

:>Well, except you. You can't even recognize the face in your mirror as
:>human.

301-884-0106 Collect. Use a phone booth.

I'm waiting.....

[Lumpy]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy
:>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:45:00 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
:>>
:>> :>Sarah has absolutely NO credibility as the person
:>> :>she claims to be...and she refuses to provide a shred of evidence...just her
:>> :>harsh demands that she be believed.
:>>
:>> Can you pick up the telephone?   Call me.   301-884-0106   Collect.
:>>
:>> Here's your chance.  
:>>
:>> Of course if you don't call then we'll all know you and yours are the
:>> liars.
:>>
:>> I'm home now.   14:16 hrs.  
:>
:>No one is going to call you. EVER.  
Because you know to do so would mean your existence here ends.  
:>You are no more to be trusted than a snarling, desperate attack dog, mad with pain
:>and fear.  You'd use the call as a weapon against the caller, and everyone knows that.
If I'm supposed to me so mad with pain and fear why is it YOU won't
make a collect phone call?   Other than the truth what are you so
terrified of, Karen?  Do you think I'll grab you by the throat and
yank you through the telephone?  
:>Well, except you. You can't even recognize the face in your mirror as
:>human.
301-884-0106  Collect.   Use a phone booth.  
I'm waiting.....

I'm not your obssession with karen, but I can tell you this. Number
One, people don't call fuckfaces on usenet. Number Two, you would
answer the phone, not "Sara/h/saran/saratoga/MrsKenEhrett.

So why bother, in any case? It's just you, Ken. You know it and I
know it. You can play your game, but you're doing it alone. All
alone. As you've been for the entire span of your obese life.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:51:42 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy
<***@gmail.com> wrote:

:>On Mar 28, 11:36 am, Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy
:>>
:>> <***@gmail.com> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>On Mar 28, 11:16 am, Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>> :>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:45:00 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
:>> :>>:>> <***@lumpo.hvn> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>Sarah has absolutely NO credibility as the person
:>> :>> :>she claims to be...and she refuses to provide a shred of evidence...just her
:>> :>> :>harsh demands that she be believed.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Can you pick up the telephone?   Call me.   301-884-0106   Collect.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Here's your chance.  
:>> :>>
:>> :>> Of course if you don't call then we'll all know you and yours are the
:>> :>> liars.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> I'm home now.   14:16 hrs.  
:>> :>
:>> :>No one is going to call you. EVER.  
:>>
:>> Because you know to do so would mean your existence here ends.  
:>>
:>> :>You are no more to be trusted than a snarling, desperate attack dog, mad with pain
:>> :>and fear.  You'd use the call as a weapon against the caller, and everyone knows that.
:>>
:>> If I'm supposed to me so mad with pain and fear why is it YOU won't
:>> make a collect phone call?   Other than the truth what are you so
:>> terrified of, Karen?  Do you think I'll grab you by the throat and
:>> yank you through the telephone?  
:>>
:>> :>Well, except you. You can't even recognize the face in your mirror as
:>> :>human.
:>>
:>> 301-884-0106  Collect.   Use a phone booth.  
:>>
:>> I'm waiting.....
:>
:>I'm not your obssession with karen,

We'll find out when we chat won't we? ;)

but I can tell you this. Number
:>One, people don't call fuckfaces on usenet. Number Two, you would
:>answer the phone, not "Sara/h/saran/saratoga/MrsKenEhrett.

And *YOU* are so terrified to make the call because...?

Don't you want PROOF? Here's you opportunity to get the PROOF you've
been demanding.

We can have a nice chat. Ken's at work.

:>So why bother, in any case?

You want PROOF. Otherwise it's all your own fantasy.

:>It's just you, Ken. You know it and I know it. You can play your game,
:>but you're doing it alone. All alone. As you've been for the entire span of your obese life.

You've just admitted you're a liar and a coward.

You demand PROOF.

Make the call. 301-884-0106

Or STFU and go away.

[GodLovesLumpy]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:51:42 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy

Post by Lumpy

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy

Post by Lumpy

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:45:00 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"

Post by Sarah Czepiel
Sarah has absolutely NO credibility as the person
she claims to be...and she refuses to provide a shred of
evidence...just her harsh demands that she be believed.

Can you pick up the telephone? Call me. 301-884-0106 Collect.
Here's your chance.
Of course if you don't call then we'll all know you and yours
are the liars.
I'm home now. 14:16 hrs.

No one is going to call you. EVER.

Because you know to do so would mean your existence here ends.

Post by Lumpy
You are no more to be trusted than a snarling, desperate
attack dog, mad with pain and fear. You'd use the call as a
weapon against the caller, and everyone knows that.

If I'm supposed to me so mad with pain and fear why is it YOU
won't make a collect phone call? Other than the truth what are
you so terrified of, Karen? Do you think I'll grab you by the
throat and yank you through the telephone?

Post by Lumpy
Well, except you. You can't even recognize the face in your mirror as
human.

301-884-0106 Collect. Use a phone booth.
I'm waiting.....

I'm not your obssession with karen,

We'll find out when we chat won't we? ;)
but I can tell you this. Number

Post by Lumpy
One, people don't call fuckfaces on usenet. Number Two, you would
answer the phone, not "Sara/h/saran/saratoga/MrsKenEhrett.

And *YOU* are so terrified to make the call because...?
Don't you want PROOF? Here's you opportunity to get the PROOF
you've been demanding.
We can have a nice chat. Ken's at work.

Post by Lumpy
So why bother, in any case?

You want PROOF. Otherwise it's all your own fantasy.

Post by Lumpy
It's just you, Ken. You know it and I know it. You can play your
game,
but you're doing it alone. All alone. As you've been for the
entire span of your obese life.

You've just admitted you're a liar and a coward.
You demand PROOF.
Make the call. 301-884-0106
Or STFU and go away.

Sarah, what you don't seem to understand is that YOU don't get to decide
what the "PROOF" is; we do. We have asked for specific examples that you
have ignored or refused to supply. Then you turn around and go on the
offensive and DEMAND that we accept YOUR offer of proof. No deal. You
answer OUR requests. We don't answer yours. Clear?

[ZapRat]

Post by GodLovesLumpy

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:51:42 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy

Post by Lumpy

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy

Post by Lumpy

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:45:00 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"

Post by Sarah Czepiel
Sarah has absolutely NO credibility as the person
she claims to be...and she refuses to provide a shred of
evidence...just her harsh demands that she be believed.

Can you pick up the telephone? Call me. 301-884-0106 Collect.
Here's your chance.
Of course if you don't call then we'll all know you and yours
are the liars.
I'm home now. 14:16 hrs.

No one is going to call you. EVER.

Because you know to do so would mean your existence here ends.

Post by Lumpy
You are no more to be trusted than a snarling, desperate
attack dog, mad with pain and fear. You'd use the call as a
weapon against the caller, and everyone knows that.

If I'm supposed to me so mad with pain and fear why is it YOU
won't make a collect phone call? Other than the truth what are
you so terrified of, Karen? Do you think I'll grab you by the
throat and yank you through the telephone?

Post by Lumpy
Well, except you. You can't even recognize the face in your mirror as
human.

301-884-0106 Collect. Use a phone booth.
I'm waiting.....

I'm not your obssession with karen,

We'll find out when we chat won't we? ;)
but I can tell you this. Number

Post by Lumpy
One, people don't call fuckfaces on usenet. Number Two, you would
answer the phone, not "Sara/h/saran/saratoga/MrsKenEhrett.

And *YOU* are so terrified to make the call because...?
Don't you want PROOF? Here's you opportunity to get the PROOF
you've been demanding.
We can have a nice chat. Ken's at work.

Post by Lumpy
So why bother, in any case?

You want PROOF. Otherwise it's all your own fantasy.

Post by Lumpy
It's just you, Ken. You know it and I know it. You can play your
game,
but you're doing it alone. All alone. As you've been for the
entire span of your obese life.

You've just admitted you're a liar and a coward.
You demand PROOF.
Make the call. 301-884-0106
Or STFU and go away.

Sarah, what you don't seem to understand is that YOU don't get to decide
what the "PROOF" is; we do. We have asked for specific examples that you
have ignored or refused to supply. Then you turn around and go on the
offensive and DEMAND that we accept YOUR offer of proof.

What "offer of proof?"

All that useless scumbag does is repeatedly post a link to a malformed
webpage that is so full of bullshit, but mostly, outright lies meant
specifically to malign an elderly female who spoke up after discovering
that the website's owner had (for two or more years) attempted to
*SWEETHEART SCAM* her as a means of financial support for his LOSER life
and so-called lifestyle.

If that piece of shit webpage/site presents the truth, then Anna Nicole
Smith was the Pope!




No deal. You

Post by GodLovesLumpy
answer OUR requests. We don't answer yours. Clear?

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:00:06 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
<***@lumpo.hvn> wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>
:>
:>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:51:42 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy
:>> <***@gmail.com> wrote:
:>>
:>>>> On Mar 28, 11:36 am, Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>>>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy
:>>>>>
:>>>>> <***@gmail.com> wrote:
:>>>>>
:>>>>>>> On Mar 28, 11:16 am, Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:45:00 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
:>>>>>>>>>>> <***@lumpo.hvn> wrote:
:>>>>>
:>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>>>> Sarah has absolutely NO credibility as the person
:>>>>>>>>>> she claims to be...and she refuses to provide a shred of
:>>>>>>>>>> evidence...just her harsh demands that she be believed.
:>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>> Can you pick up the telephone? Call me. 301-884-0106 Collect.
:>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>> Here's your chance.
:>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>> Of course if you don't call then we'll all know you and yours
:>>>>>>>> are the liars.
:>>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>> I'm home now. 14:16 hrs.
:>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>> No one is going to call you. EVER.
:>>>>>
:>>>>> Because you know to do so would mean your existence here ends.
:>>>>>
:>>>>>>> You are no more to be trusted than a snarling, desperate
:>>>>>>> attack dog, mad with pain and fear. You'd use the call as a
:>>>>>>> weapon against the caller, and everyone knows that.
:>>>>>
:>>>>> If I'm supposed to me so mad with pain and fear why is it YOU
:>>>>> won't make a collect phone call? Other than the truth what are
:>>>>> you so terrified of, Karen? Do you think I'll grab you by the
:>>>>> throat and yank you through the telephone?
:>>>>>
:>>>>>>> Well, except you. You can't even recognize the face in your
:>>>>>>> mirror as
:>>>>>>> human.
:>>>>>
:>>>>> 301-884-0106 Collect. Use a phone booth.
:>>>>>
:>>>>> I'm waiting.....
:>>>>
:>>>> I'm not your obssession with karen,
:>>
:>> We'll find out when we chat won't we? ;)
:>>
:>> but I can tell you this. Number
:>>>> One, people don't call fuckfaces on usenet. Number Two, you would
:>>>> answer the phone, not "Sara/h/saran/saratoga/MrsKenEhrett.
:>>
:>> And *YOU* are so terrified to make the call because...?
:>>
:>> Don't you want PROOF? Here's you opportunity to get the PROOF
:>> you've been demanding.
:>>
:>> We can have a nice chat. Ken's at work.
:>>
:>>>> So why bother, in any case?
:>>
:>> You want PROOF. Otherwise it's all your own fantasy.
:>>
:>>>> It's just you, Ken. You know it and I know it. You can play your
:>>>> game,
:>>>> but you're doing it alone. All alone. As you've been for the
:>>>> entire span of your obese life.
:>>
:>> You've just admitted you're a liar and a coward.
:>>
:>> You demand PROOF.
:>>
:>> Make the call. 301-884-0106
:>>
:>> Or STFU and go away.
:>
:>Sarah, what you don't seem to get is that YOU don't get to decide what the
:>"PROOF" is; we do. We have asked for specific examples that you have
:>ignored or refused to supply.

Yeah? Call me. Let's discuss it.

:>Then you turn around and go on the offensive and DEMAND that we accept YOUR offers of proof.

What more definitive proof is there than a phone call?

Call me.

:> No deal. You answer OUR requests. We don't answer yours. Clear?
:>

Tough talk from a sniveling coward too afraid to speak with someone on
a telephone.

Make the call you silly ass. 301-884-0106

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:22:51 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
<***@lumpo.hvn> wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>> How would
:>>>> that end any of our "existences" here in YOUR newsgroup?
:>>
:>> I'll tell you when you call.
:>
:>You will advise us that the call is being recorded.
:>
:>>>> Of course not. You would use it forever in your twisted way on
:>>>> Usenet.
:>>
:>> Use what? You're whiny high pitched voice?
:>
:>Confirmed. You want a recorded VOICE from the incoming caller that you can
:>use to your advantage.

I would be fascinated to hear what advantage you think I could
possibly get ? Unless of course you intend to be abusive and make
only guttural sounds like Linda Blair, then you might have a problem.

:>Thanks for admitting why you DEMAND phone calls. But you don't get to call
:>the shots, Sarah. You post what you've been requested to. Some examples
:>follow:
:>
:>VERIFIABLE:
:>
:>1) Photos of yourself with Ken
:> a) Photos of yourself with husband Bill and son(s)
:>2) Divorce from Bill Czepiel records
:>3) Marriage to Ken Ehrett records
:>4) Evidence of the properties you own in MD


Bwahahaha....! Listen up gutter trash: I don't have to post squat,
just like the Salvation Army doesn't have to feed your sorry ass every
night. You're not in the position to demand anything from me. If
you cannot pickup a phone and call me it just goes to illustrate that
you are a pathetic mentally ill anonymous coward. Normal people pick
up the phone and speak with each other. Your psychosis and paranoia
has you envisioning all sorts of ridiculous scenarios.

See how we know you're Karen Anderson?

And the truth is you're terrified of anyone knowing it.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:45:00 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
<***@lumpo.hvn> wrote:

:> Ken/Sarah have "won" NOTHING.

Your whiny chronology of victimhood notwithstanding..... ;)

:>They've exposed who/what >they are (to some degree), but they have waged their war built on LIES

These aren't lies....

http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Cmelak.htm
http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm


:>...... but the TRUTH always prevails, sooner or later.


I vote sooner. PROVE to everyone you're the truth.

Make the call. Let's chat. 301-884-0106

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:29:58 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
<***@gmail.com> lied:

:> Bill told me on the phone that he had one son.

You seem to have a pattern of lying about who you talk with on the
phone, Karen.

You've lied about calling Bill.
You've lied about calling my neighbors.
You've lied about calling the real estate people.
You've lied about calling to the owner of the house next door,
You've lied about calling a lawyer in RI.
You've lied about calling some LOWV woman.
You've lied about calling the Pentagon.

You've lied about every single person you claim to have called and now
you refuse to call me.

You're a pathological liar with a phone phobia.

I'll verify that again with your medical records.

[GodLovesLumpy]

Post by Sarah Czepiel
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:29:58 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson

Post by Sarah Czepiel
Bill told me on the phone that he had one son.

You seem to have a pattern of lying about who you talk with on the
phone, Karen.
You've lied about calling Bill.
You've lied about calling my neighbors.
You've lied about calling the real estate people.
You've lied about calling to the owner of the house next door,
You've lied about calling a lawyer in RI.
You've lied about calling some LOWV woman.
You've lied about calling the Pentagon.
You've lied about every single person you claim to have called and
now you refuse to call me.
You're a pathological liar with a phone phobia.
I'll verify that again with your medical records.

Get it through your fuckin' knot, "Sarah", that Lumpy is NOT Karen, nor is
Jose, nor Hoodoo, nor me, nor anybody ELSE you claim is Karen. She is NOT
HERE and hasn't been for a very long time. Try to get some kind of contact
with reality, OK?

And you don't have anybody's "medical records", especially "Karen's". More
of your bluffing and delusions. If you think you do have something in
writing, you have broken the law. Medical records are NOT given out to any
nutcase on the internet that requests them, especially when they don't know
where to look or what they are looking for.

Maybe YOU are the one who should be sued for LIBEL....

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:18:55 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
<***@lumpo.hvn> wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:29:58 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
:>> <***@gmail.com> lied:
:>>
:>>>> Bill told me on the phone that he had one son.
:>>
:>> You seem to have a pattern of lying about who you talk with on the
:>> phone, Karen.
:>>
:>> You've lied about calling Bill.
:>> You've lied about calling my neighbors.
:>> You've lied about calling the real estate people.
:>> You've lied about calling to the owner of the house next door,
:>> You've lied about calling a lawyer in RI.
:>> You've lied about calling some LOWV woman.
:>> You've lied about calling the Pentagon.
:>>
:>> You've lied about every single person you claim to have called and
:>> now you refuse to call me.
:>>
:>> You're a pathological liar with a phone phobia.
:>>
:>> I'll verify that again with your medical records.
:>
:>Get it through your fuckin' knot, "Sarah", that Lumpy is NOT Karen, nor is
:>Jose, nor Hoodoo, nor me, nor anybody ELSE you claim is Karen. She is NOT
:>HERE and hasn't been for a very long time. Try to get some kind of contact
:>with reality, OK?
:>
:>And you don't have anybody's "medical records", especially "Karen's". More
:>of your bluffing and delusions. If you think you do have something in
:>writing, you have broken the law. Medical records are NOT given out to any
:>nutcase on the internet that requests them, especially when they don't know
:>where to look or what they are looking for.
:>
:>Maybe YOU are the one who should be sued for LIBEL....

Bring it on, Shitass. ;)

[Lumpy]

, Shitass.   >>

Ken's new compulsive word for the next nanosecond/minute/day/decade/
millennium. Replacing his ceaseless "Denthead", thank God.

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:17:24 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
<***@SeeMeHere_http//www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm>
blubbered:

:>>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm
:>>I look like a Shitass.   >>

Uh huh...

[Dave Witmarsh]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:17:24 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy

Post by Lumpy

, Shitass.   >>

Ken's new compulsive word for the next nanosecond/minute/day/decade/
millennium. Replacing his ceaseless "Denthead", thank God.

Whose turn is it to be Kencrim's beloved "Denthead" this week?

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:59:23 -0700, "GodLovesLumpy"
<***@lumpo.hvn> wrote:

:>Sarah Czepiel <***@cox.net> wrote:
:>>
:>> " Bill says he and Sarah have only one son. "
:>>
:>> See if you spot the 'so obvious you need a clue bat upside da head'
:>> faulty logic to your conclusion, " Sarah has only one son".
:>
:>OK....Sarah had 2 sons before she began being monagomous with Bill for 32
:>years. Somebody other than Bill Czepiel is their father.
:>
:>Message-ID: <***@mb-m20.aol.com>
:>
:>>>> They slip up all the time, but it seems very little of it is
:>>>> noticed or pointed out.
:>>>> For as little positive purpose as Ken's life has, Sarah's has
:>>>> even less. It's pathetic, actually. "They" are pathetic.
:>>
:>> Again libeling an innocent woman and her family.
:>
:>YOU dragged her into this. YOU posted her Rhode Island phone number long
:>ago and DEMANDED someone phone immediately. That was before she morphed
:>into Mrs.KenEhrett in MD.....with a new phone # you demand be called.

All these phone calls by Lumpy to Bill and no one asked to speak with
Sara/h ?????

Are you shit asses really that stupid?

:>Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
:>
:>
:>Is this the hag in a Red Dress that Ken claims is Sarah Czepiel and is "slim
:>and lovely"?
:>
:>Loading Image...

Linky no worky, shitass.

Here's the ugly hag http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm
you and your five nyms are on a crusade for....

[Sarah Czepiel]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:07:03 -0700 (PDT), Lumpy Karen Anderson
<SeeMeHere@ http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm> wrote:


:>http://www.buccaneerpublishing.com/Anderson1.htm
:>LAUGHINGLAUGHINGLAUGHING

RETCHINGRETCHINGRETCHING

[ZapRat]

... to dig
thru a Salvation Army bin and find you shit stained coat that hasn't
been chewed up too badly by the rats.

You mean pyrate/piratejohn wesley gilmer III or the fugly financial
benefactor of whom he's a parasite got so drunk that they tossed out
some of their best clothing? Wow! They ARE charitable.

[PyrateJohn]

Must be tough stuck in that drafty trailer trying to keep your fingers
warm thru those brutal Wisconsin winters pining over others enjoying
the good life.  Sucks to be you huh?  Maybe you could ask Karen to dig
thru a Salvation Army bin and find you shit stained coat  that hasn't
been chewed up too badly by the rats.  

I wonder if Cmelak's smart enough to realize that both Key West and
New Orleans are roughly 500 miles one-way from my house, or a 1,000
mile round trip? So my statements that he took out of context are not
only accurate but they are consistent.

Probably not. Because Cmelak is a dumb fucker. Almost as dumb as
Anderson.

After all Ken, the nyms here still seem to think that you and Sarah
are the same person even though I have spoken to both of you on the
phone and you guys were at times talking simultaneously. As I once
said the best Las Vegas ventriloguist act couldn't do that. They are
stupid, stupid, stupid people.

As good as you guys are at running down the Anderson trolls I don't
see why you mess with them. When the proceedings start then there
will be plenty of information available as to which trolls are really
separate people, and Cmelak, Anderson, and a couple of others that I
have already identified will have to show up in court or risk a
default judgement. At that time we can see just how attractive these
old fools are that hide behind nyms. And you and I both know how this
will shake out - Anderson is indeed a 350 lb. old woman and Cmelak is
indeed a fat-assed old fool that's the village idiot of a small town
in Wisconsin that's barely a wide place in the road. Nothing more,
nothing less.

Incidently Cmelak, here are our photos from our last Key West and New
Orleans trips. Photos don't lie, even if bullshit artists like you
and the nyms have never told a truth in your lives.

New Orleans:

http://www.fototime.com/inv/2245DB13C0EF8D0

Key West:

http://www.fototime.com/inv/9294A1FCCCDC7AD

--PirateJohn--
www.PirateJohn.com